Edison Electric Institute released a report last year
that was remarkably honest in its assessment of the future of utilities.
Utilities have a product; they sell electric power that they generate
from expensive sources. (coal fire plants, turbines) They spread the
cost of these expensive sources across the huge user base. Power demands
vary over the day and week but power at the peak times of the day and
week is the most expensive. Solar power is beginning to emerge as a real
alternative and its use is highest during peak hours. This is cutting
into the high billing period of utilities. As the cost and efficiencies
of solar panels--and batteries--continue, more people are turning to
them. This is decreasing the returns of the utilities which must, in
turn, raise the cost of power to those remaining on their grid. This
rise pushes more people away from their power as solar power becomes a
more cost effective alternative. This creates a spiral of decreasing
utility returns as they serve fewer people during peak hours and more
during down hours. This makes them less rewarding and predictable an
investment and requires them to raise the returns they can provide their
investors, again raising their costs.
Duke Energy
CEO Jim Rogers said, “If the cost of solar panels keeps coming down,
installation costs come down and if they combine solar with battery
technology and a power management system, then we have someone just
using [the grid] for backup.” If a lot of customers start generating
their own power and using the grid merely as backup, the EEI report
warns of “irreparable damages to revenues and growth prospects” of
utilities.
Bloomberg Energy Finance forecasts 22
percent compound annual growth in all solar PV, which means that by 2020
distributed solar (which will account for about 15 percent of total PV)
could reach up to 10 percent of load in certain areas. If that
happens rates will increase 20%. ( PV is "photovoltaic," electrical energy from solar radiation.)
No comments:
Post a Comment