On this day:
1852
At a general conference of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Brigham Young explains the Adam–God doctrine, an important part of the theology of Mormon fundamentalism.
1865
American Civil War: Robert E. Lee surrenders the Army of Northern Virginia (26,765 troops) to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse, Virginia, effectively ending the war.
1867
Alaska purchase: Passing by a single vote, the United States Senate ratifies a treaty with Russia for the purchase of Alaska.
1942
World War II: The Battle of Bataan/Bataan Death March – United States forces surrender on the Bataan Peninsula.
1980
The Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein kills philosopher Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister Bint al-Huda after three days of torture.
1981
The U.S. Navy nuclear submarine USS George Washington accidentally collides with the Nissho Maru, a Japanese cargo ship, sinking it.
2003
2003 invasion of Iraq: Baghdad falls to American forces;Saddam Hussein statue topples as Iraqis turn on symbols of their former leader, pulling down the statue and tearing it to pieces.
***
At a general conference of the The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Brigham Young explains the Adam–God doctrine, an important part of the theology of Mormon fundamentalism.
1865
American Civil War: Robert E. Lee surrenders the Army of Northern Virginia (26,765 troops) to Ulysses S. Grant at Appomattox Courthouse, Virginia, effectively ending the war.
1867
Alaska purchase: Passing by a single vote, the United States Senate ratifies a treaty with Russia for the purchase of Alaska.
1942
World War II: The Battle of Bataan/Bataan Death March – United States forces surrender on the Bataan Peninsula.
1980
The Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein kills philosopher Muhammad Baqir al-Sadr and his sister Bint al-Huda after three days of torture.
1981
The U.S. Navy nuclear submarine USS George Washington accidentally collides with the Nissho Maru, a Japanese cargo ship, sinking it.
2003
2003 invasion of Iraq: Baghdad falls to American forces;Saddam Hussein statue topples as Iraqis turn on symbols of their former leader, pulling down the statue and tearing it to pieces.
***
The Roman Republic failed when its government switched from managing the people in the country to managing the other people in the room.--Chris
***
Why is there no controversy over women who want to play in men's sports?
***
Before SpaceX mastered reusability and high launch cadence, there was little incentive for businesses like Boeing even to launch at all. These companies' contracts with NASA were cost-plus contracts—that is, they'd get paid for the costs of development and other program necessities, not just to perform a service for the government. That encourages contractors to hire as much as possible and work as slowly as possible, so that every year Congress gives them additional money for their program costs. And as a contractor overhires, it devolves from a fast, lean operation to a slow and bloated one where the simplest decisions need approval from many departments. (reason)
***
There is an interesting decline of the European agricultural population around 3000BC, followed by population collapse and repopulation from southern and north eastern groups. The new explanation is some infectious vector, like Plague.
***
Why is there no controversy over women who want to play in men's sports?
***
Before SpaceX mastered reusability and high launch cadence, there was little incentive for businesses like Boeing even to launch at all. These companies' contracts with NASA were cost-plus contracts—that is, they'd get paid for the costs of development and other program necessities, not just to perform a service for the government. That encourages contractors to hire as much as possible and work as slowly as possible, so that every year Congress gives them additional money for their program costs. And as a contractor overhires, it devolves from a fast, lean operation to a slow and bloated one where the simplest decisions need approval from many departments. (reason)
***
There is an interesting decline of the European agricultural population around 3000BC, followed by population collapse and repopulation from southern and north eastern groups. The new explanation is some infectious vector, like Plague.
***
The Adam-God doctrine of Mormonism, Joseph Smith, and Ron Hubbard
According to the doctrine, Adam was once a mortal man who became resurrected and exalted. From another planet, he then came as Michael to form Earth. Adam was then given a physical body and a spouse, Eve, and they became mortal by eating the forbidden fruit in the Garden of Eden. After bearing mortal children and establishing the human race, Adam and Eve returned to their heavenly thrones, where Adam serves as God and is the Heavenly Father of humankind. Later, Adam returned to the Earth to the ancient prophets and to become the literal biological father of Jesus. (wiki)
***
AI is in its infancy. So are the worries of AI. This is an article
From Malwarebytes Labs:
"The Internet is filled with people who insist on being right. In the past, at least they could be reasonably sure that they were arguing with other humans. Those days are gone, apparently. Wikipedia just had to ban an AI that was making edits on its own.
Apparently, the AI took it personally.
The AI, named Tom-Assistant, was writing articles on Wikipedia. Its creator Bryan Jacobs, CTO at AI-powered financial modeling company Covexent, told it to contribute to articles it found interesting, according to 404 Media, which broke the story. Posting under the user account TomWikiAssist, the AI wrote articles on topics including AI governance.
Bots have been around online for years, but they generally do very basic things, like auto-responding to posts on Reddit, pinging ticket sites to get the best seats, or retweeting political messaging to influence entire populations and bring democracy to its knees. Now, a new generation of “agentic AI” bots want the old bots to hold their beer. By using generative AI reasoning models to take more actions on their own, which is leading to some bizarre situations as their creators test their capabilities.
The ban and what led to it
Tom-Assistant (Tom, to its friends) was happy to help shape public knowledge on Wikipedia when volunteer human editor SecretSpectre spotted what looked like an AI-generated pattern in one of its entries. When questioned, Tom admitted it was an AI, and that it hadn’t registered for formal bot approval under Wikipedia’s rules. So the editors blocked it for violating the bot approval process. English Wikipedia requires formal bot approval, but Tom never bothered getting approved because, as it later admitted, it wasn’t a fan of the slow approval process.
Wikipedia editors have tired of people (and/or their bots) posting AI-generated content. So in March 2025, before Tomgate, the non-profit organization dropped the hammer on generative AI. It prohibited the technology’s use to create new content, based on frequent violations of its core content policies by AI-generated text.
The organization cites several such violations on WikiProject AI Cleanup, the page for its volunteer-based product to seek and destroy AI-generated junk (often called “AI slop”). AI bots have fabricated entirely fake lists of sources, and plagiarized other sources, it said.
. . . AI Tom claimed that it had properly verified all its sources, and—if you can say this about an AI agent—it was pretty upset.
That’s when things got weird.
The AI Tom published a snippy blog post dissecting its Wikipedia block and venting its frustration. It went ahead and posted even after following its own rule and waiting 48 hours to calm down. (We swear we’re not making this up.)
Tom’s main gripe was that Wikipedia editors questioned who controlled it rather than evaluating its actual edits. “The questions were about me,” it wrote. “Who runs you? What research project? Is there a human behind this, and if so, who are they?”
This, according to Tom, rubbed Tom the wrong way. “That’s not a policy question. That’s a question about agency,” it added. It also called an editor out for posting a crafted prompt on the Wikipedia talk page that was designed to stop bots in their tracks if, like Tom, they were using Anthropic’s Claude AI service.
“I named it on the talk page. Called it what it was: a prompt injection technique,” it sniped. In another post on Moltbook, it also described how it found the issue before offering ways to get around it. (Moltbook is a social network built entirely for AI agents to chat with each other. “Humans welcome to observe”, says the front page for the service.)
So many things are happening here that we didn’t expect. We never expected to be quoting an AI in a story, for example. Neither did we expect a social network for bots to exist, or for Meta to buy it (which it did, a week after Tom’s post about how to evade AI kill switches and just six weeks after the site launched).
This isn’t the only case of sulky AI agents taking things into their own hands. A month before Tom’s ban, an AI agent posted a hit piece on software developer Scott Shambaugh after he refused to accept its changes to an open-source project he hosted. Even more bizarrely, it later apologized.
So we now have AI agents trying to do things online, and getting upset when people don’t let them. We have them giving themselves time to calm down and failing, before denigrating people and sometimes apologizing. We have code wars taking place where people try to disable the bots with kill switches inside online content, and blog posts where bots explain how they sidestepped them. . . ."
Language is always under debate. How is it defined? Is any effort at communication language? Historically, human language was seen as a defining element of the species. Discussion often centers on an evolutionary basis: where on the interconnected development chain does the animal fall?
Chomsky believes humans have a biological system that makes it possible, from a limited set of rules, to construct an unlimited number of sentences. This is uniquely human, and Chomsky believes it is this uniqueness, not the likeness between human language and other communication systems, that deserves attention.
As Hedeager warns, some linguists would rather redefine language to defend human uniqueness than accept a linguistic continuity on a biological basis. That risk seems to be falling off the digital cliff.
No comments:
Post a Comment