How would one define capitalism? The Krupp family owned many of the
companies under the wartime production of Nazi Germany; was that
capitalism? The Chinese are emerging as aggressive, enriching producers
and competitors throughout the world; is that capitalism? Is the
defining of "free enterprise" in the cold terms of the hard capital that
is part of free enterprise reasonable or inaccurate?
Economies
are made up of exchanges, labor and goods. Generally there are two kinds
of goods, consumption goods and capital goods. Consumption goods are
those that are produced and
consumed. Capital goods are those goods used to
create the consumption goods--the means of production like farms,
factories, laboratories, etc. Every
society above the hunter-gatherer level has both consumption and
capital goods. (Maybe the bow and the arrow are capital goods.)
There are three
main sociopolitical/economic systems. One, "communism," wherein the State owns and controls the means
of production and distribution, two, "fascism," where the private citizen may
own the capital goods, but the State tells him how and when it can be
used, and how the products can be distributed, and, three, "private enterprise," where the private
individual or company both owns and controls the means of production,
and the market self-regulates the distribution of products. Are those definitions enough?
If
those definitions are acceptable, "socialism" looks most like communism
but has a mixture of these with varying degrees of penetration. For
example, the United States owned a number of energy sources (dams and
power plants) that actually competed with private systems and negotiated
with private outlets for distribution. The American governmental owned postal
system competes with a number of private systems. The State of
Pennsylvania owns all the liquor stores in the state and competition
with them is illegal.
So where does capitalism come in? Is it
free enterprise? Does it have to be totally free, like there is nothing
like "sort of pregnant" or "mostly secure?" Why does the capital part
have such prominence rather than labor; can a farmer be a capitalist? Can he not be?
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment