Life never knows the return of spring. --John Gay in
Beggar's Opera
My graphs don't fit.
Beginning in the 1660s, many British productions allowed Romeo and Juliet to live on, or had Juliet wake up for a simultaneous death-duet with Romeo; until about 1730, some companies played to all tastes, offering the 'tragic death' and the 'happily-ever-after' versions on alternating nights.
The average cost to make “Game of Thrones” per episode is $6 to $8 million.
It will cost $60 to $80 million to make a whole season of Game of Thrones.
Interesting origin but I can't fix the font either:
Cocksure: PRONUNCIATION: (KOK-shoor, kok-SHOOR) MEANING:
adjective: Arrogantly or presumptuously overconfident. ETYMOLOGY: From cock (a euphemism for god) + sure, from Old French seur, from
Latin securus (secure). Earliest documented use: 1520.
Cowen on the
incoherent anthem silliness: "Nor do we play the anthem before movies,
as is mandatory in India. Furthermore, “The Star-Spangled Banner” wasn’t
sanctioned by Congress as our national anthem until
1931. Earlier in the history of baseball, the anthem was played during
the seventh-inning stretch. It was only during World War II that the
anthem was played regularly at the beginning of each game, rather than
for special games alone, such as the World Series."
Starting in 2018, the Governmental Accounting Standards Board—the source of generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for state and local governments—will force officials to record healthcare liabilities on their balance sheets. These are the liabilities that governments are committed to, retirees and the like. Pew Charitable Trusts estimates the national shortfall will add up to $645 billion.
Earlier this
month, Swiss voters rejected a pension reform plan that would have
strengthened the system by raising women’s retirement age from 64 to 65
and raising taxes and required worker contributions.
From what I can see, these were fairly minor changes, but the plan
still went down in flames as 52.7% of voters said no. A
study shows
that the United Kingdom has a $4 trillion retirement savings shortfall,
which is projected to rise 4% a year and reach $33 trillion by 2050.
This in a country whose total GDP is $3 trillion.
That means the shortfall is already bigger than the entire economy.
As Ronald Bailey of Reason magazine
calculates, current global average income
per capita is about $10,000. If the world grows at 3 percent per year
over the next 80 years or so, global average income per capita will rise
to $97,000. According to Nordhaus and Moffatt’s estimations, therefore,
an increase in global temperature by 3°C
would reduce global average income per capita by $2,000 to $95,000. A
6°C increase in global temperature would reduce global average income
per capita by $8,000 to $89,000.
“We
have a predicament,” Bailey concludes. “How much are we willing to
spend in order to make those living in 2100, who will likely be at least
nine times richer than us today,
$2,000 better off?”
Poor families in 2005 were more likely to own things like a clothes
dryer, dishwasher, refrigerator, or air conditioner than the average household was in 1971.
The Los Angeles
Times (9/26, Karlamangla) reports that “for the second year in a row,”
US diagnoses of “chlamydia, gonorrhea or syphilis reached a record
high.” The article says “more than 2 million cases”
of the three sexually transmitted diseases were reported in 2016,
according to data released by the CDC on Tuesday. The Times adds that
the rise in women with syphilis has caused a corresponding increase in
congenital syphilis among newborns, which has nearly
doubled to 632 cases since 2012.
This from the
WSJ. This may be less of a rebuke of Trump than an indication that the
anti-politician movement may be out of control, indeed may be
incompatible with leadership.
In 1939, Germany and the Soviet Union agreed to divide control of occupied Poland roughly along the Bug River–the Germans taking everything west, the Soviets taking everything east.
It was a follow-up to the Ribbentrop-Molotov Pact.
Governments of power seeking their natural level.
Fifty-three percent of Americans
support single payer health care, according to a June 2017 poll from the Kaiser Family Foundation.
But, BUT....according to the same Kaiser poll, 62% would oppose single-payer if it gave the government too
much power over health care. Sixty percent would reject it if it increased taxes.
So, how do the people in favor of single payer expect this would work?
Sanders
estimated that the single-payer plan he proposed during his
presidential campaign would cost $1.4 trillion a year. To cover that
cost, the plan included a 2.2% income tax
and a 6.2% tax on employers, i.e. products.
So, how do the people in favor of single payer expect this would work?
The
liberal Urban Institute's analysis of Sanders' campaign plan found that
federal expenditures would surge $32 trillion over its first 10 years.
Total
U.S. health spending from all payers, public and private, was $3.2
trillion in 2015, the most recent year for which there are data.
So Sander's
single-payer plan would double what our entire nation spends on health care each year to the federal budget.
AAAAaaaaaaaaaaaannnnnnnddddddd......a picture/metaphor of the American debt crisis:
Photo: DWS via Flickr
No comments:
Post a Comment