What is Too Much in the Defense of Life?
Global warming has reached an inflection point according to its believers. We are at the point of extinction. Warming is the single threat to human life. Despite man's constant and reliable bellicosity, his incredible destructive nuclear potential, the heavily armed --and threatening--totalitarian countries, the willingness to be totally destroyed over a nationalistic or political point (see Castro).
The West has taken this seriously and has begun to modify its behavior. American CO2 production has been declining. But India and China continue to bull ahead, using cheap carbon fuels to develop their economies, even admitting they will continue to increase CO2 production until they reach their carbon peak in 2030. Kerry and his adherents believe we will be dying at that point.
So, if you believe the world is increasingly vulnerable to global warming, and if you believe the world has a narrowing window of intervention, and if you believe that India and China are, essentially, ending human life with their carbon policies, what efforts aimed at India and China by the rest of mankind are legitimate? And, for the very survival of mankind, is any action too much?
1 comment:
I thought the czars were gone
Nicholas 2 was the last one
Global warming has become a religion to cooks.Still worried about
Chinese and Ruskies
Post a Comment