Monday, August 15, 2016

What the Olympics Really Says About Us

An illness of unknown potential is endemic in Brazil. Gold medalist Ryan Lochte  has reportedly been held up at gunpoint during a party in Rio. Countless people are uprooted to build these Olympic villages every time they are built. Over one million people lost their homes for the 2008 Beijing games alone. Brazil has similarly evicted large numbers of people for the current Olympics in Rio, and even more to build the stadiums for the 2014 World Cup. Usually these efforts lose money; a single exception is the privately funded Los Angeles Olympics. But they are very good for propaganda to pump up the appearance of the host country, particularly despotic ones. This all asks the obvious question: Why is there not a permanent Olympic site? It would help the athletes, the people, the economics...so, why not?
Because the politicians, their bureaucracies and their cronies could not take as much advantage of the situation. As always, the political infrastructure trumps everything else. And this is for games; imagine what it is like for conflict.
Brotherhood. Sportsmanship. Safety of the athletes. Safety of the world, for that matter. All as phony as a gymnast's smile.
The Olympics are a metaphor for our lives.

Sunday, August 14, 2016

Sunday 8/14/16

Christ taught a religion of peace and gentleness, empathy and compassion. But it was disruptive and, as such, wrenching and painful. The spiritual elements are in contradistinction to the very emotional and material gifts that allow for success and advancement in the world. Gifts that allowed the species to evolve. Displacing them require serious effort because the material is more than natural, it is advantageous. To rise above the material requires the identification of those currents so basic in us, so helpful in our early development, and to substitute Christ's spirituality. And the foundation stone of that old world--that ancient homo sapien, that Old Testament--is identity. We are a product of our ability to see ourselves in a larger context, as a part of a larger group of people: Family, Friends, Community, Tribe, Nation and Race. That identification strengthens us against our opponents. What is called "xenophobia" by our moderns was, in history, a lifesaver. And now, in our more crowded world, a killer. Christ asks that we eliminate the old and limiting context of exclusion and expand it to include all humanity, the New Testament of inclusion.

In today's Gospel Christ says how hard that evolution will be:

Jesus said to his disciples:
“I have come to set the earth on fire,
and how I wish it were already blazing!
There is a baptism with which I must be baptized,
and how great is my anguish until it is accomplished!
Do you think that I have come to establish peace on the earth?
No, I tell you, but rather division.
From now on a household of five will be divided,
three against two and two against three;
a father will be divided against his son
and a son against his father,
a mother against her daughter
and a daughter against her mother,
a mother-in-law against her daughter-in-law
and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law.”


Well, at least the first part of it is working.

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Cab Thoughts 8/13/16

One ought, every day at least, to hear a little song, read a good poem, see a fine picture and, if it were possible, speak a few reasonable words. -Johann Wolfgang von Goethe, poet, dramatist, novelist, and philosopher (1749-1832)


Judge Andrew S. Hanen of Federal District Court in Brownsville accused the Justice Department lawyers of lying to him during arguments in the case, and he barred them from appearing in his courtroom. From an article in the NYT on May, 16, 2016 titled "Federal Judges in Texas Demands Justice Dept. Lawyers Take Ethics Class." The Feds are lying to each other. Lawyers are lying to judges.

A petition has appeared at Yale exhorting the college to “decolonize” its English curriculum. Their demands: abolish the major English poets and revise the remaining requirements “to deliberately include literatures relating to gender, race, sexuality, ableism, and ethnicity.” “It is your responsibility as educators to listen to student voices,” the letter concludes. “We have spoken. We are speaking. Pay attention.”
Split infinitive aside, this is a peculiar request.  First, there are a lot of "alternative" options in the curriculum. In addition to featuring names like Elizabeth Bishop and Ralph Ellison in its survey classes, the course catalog presents such titles as “Women Writers from the Restoration to Romanticism,” “Race and Gender in American Literature,” “American Artists and the African American Book,” “The Spectacle of Disability,” “Asian American Literature,” “Chaucer and Discourses of Dissent,” “Postcolonial World Literature: 1945-present,” “Black Literature and U.S. Liberalism.” This does not include the cross listings with the comparative literature; American studies; and women’s, gender, and sexuality studies departments. But more important, the demands ask for the exclusion of accomplished poets from the English canon because of the lack of representation of others. (an exclusion they took no part of.)
One element that will never enter this debate is "quality." In these discussions quantity always trumps quality. To a certain mind, numbers always win.

Leftists are as predictably nostalgic for dying firms as they are hostile to whatever firms are today thriving and most profitable, applauding and praising only firms that are currently in decline while despising and criticizing firms that are currently at their peak. In some respects, they support inefficiency and failure and oppose efficiency and success. This strange behavior may encourage Mrs. Clinton when president to underwrite coal companies.

People have made lists of "honest national governments." Hierarchies of them. 170 countries ranked from declining honesty. Somehow the Scandinavians do well on such lists. If you take one of these lists and separate out the top 30 in perceived honesty, you would have under that group only 14% of the world's population. So 86% of the world's population is governed by people on the low side of trustworthiness. That is quite a vision of the world.

What is....gluten?

What we measure--that is, what we think is a good metric for what we want to achieve--is crucial to analysis. If we measure academic achievement by the issuance of a college degree, but the process of earning that degree does not measure real student learning, then what are we measuring with college diplomas? What we’re really measuring is the students’ ability to navigate an academic bureaucracy for four or five years. Since we’re not measuring useful learning, we have no way to hold colleges accountable for their demonstrable failure to teach useful skills. We may not be measuring what is representative of what we want to analyze, we may be analyzing what we can.

Irina Nistor has one of the most famous voices in Romania. While working as a translator of censored television programs in Romania under the Communist regime, she secretly dubbed over 3,000 banned movie titles on VHS tapes smuggled in from the West. The black market for these films flourished during the Cold War, bringing visions of life outside communism into the minds of the many. The documentary "Chuck Norris VS Communism" is about Nistor and the impact Western movies had on the imaginations of Romanians living under authoritarianism. Perhaps this is overreaching sociology but recently there have been charges by Iran's Revolutionary Guard Corps that Kim Kardashian is subverting Iranian culture.

IMF--the IMF!--authors Jonathan D. Ostry, Prakash Loungani, and Davide Furceri issued a research paper titled "Neoliberalism: Oversold?" whose theme is a stunning one: it accuses neoliberalism, (by which they mean "capitalism") and its immediate offshoot, globalization and "financial openness", for causing not only inequality, but also making capital markets unstable. The IMF!
 

Freedom of Religion update:
The leader of a Pakistani Islamic council has proposed a bill that allows husbands to "lightly beat" their wives as a form of discipline. In the 75-page proposal, Mohammad Khan Sheerani suggests a light beating is acceptable should the need arise to punish a woman. The proposal bans forceful beating, saying only a small stick is necessary to instill fear. The Council of Islamic Ideology is a powerful constitutional body that advises the Pakistani legislature whether laws are in line with the teachings of Islam.

A guy named Glenn Reynolds writes for USA Today argues that power is generally accepted in government if the power is held by "your guy." George Bush never was questioned by FOX. The left has let Obama's abuses slide because he is "their guy." He writes:  It’s terrible, we’re told, that Trump is issuing veiled threats to journalists — though Obama joked about auditing his enemies, seizing journalist phone records and threatened a journalist who refused to reveal sources with imprisonment. Trump would be a warmonger, we’re told, although in fact Barack Obama has been at war longer than any other U.S. president, if without any particular success. Trump would arrogantly ride roughshod over any opposition, though Barack Obama famously used “I won” as an excuse to ignore opponents and bragged that he had a “pen and a phone” to bypass congressional disagreement. (And he’s used them a lot.)
Many of the journalists and pundits who see Trump as the next imperial president were silent over these Obama actions....Every president has some wiggle room, but white male Republicans have less in our system. So if you want the imperial presidency to wiggle less, that’s whom we should elect. And if that’s what it takes to get the press to do its job of scrutinizing and criticizing power, then that’s what we need.

There are many definitions of Populism but this is a good one: "the political doctrine that supports the rights and powers of the common people in their struggle with the privileged elite." Now that seems to be a pretty benign and positive definition. So...how come people dislike populists so much?

Vladimir Nabokov on the demon of generalities: This demon is fond of words such as “idea”, “tendency”, “influence”, “period”, and “era”. In the historian’s study this demon reductively combines in hindsight the phenomena, influences and tendencies of past ages. With this demon comes appalling tedium – the knowledge (utterly mistaken, by the way) that, however humanity plays its hand or fights back, it follows an implacable course. This demon should be feared. He is a fraud. He is a salesman of centuries, pushing his historical price list. And the most awful thing, perhaps, happens when the temptation of completely comfortable generalities seizes us in contemplation not of past, well-worn times, but of that time in which we live.

Golden oldie:
Scholars Stephen Brooks and William Wohlforth point out that China is the closest the United States has to a rising rival but only on one measure, gross domestic product. A better, broader measure of economic power, Brooks and Wohlforth argue, is “inclusive wealth.” This is the sum of a nation’s “manufactured capital (roads, buildings, machines and equipment), human capital (skills, education, health) and natural capital (sub-soil resources, ecosystems, the atmosphere).” The United States’ inclusive wealth totaled almost $144 trillion in 2010 — 4½ times China’s $32 trillion.
Brooks and Wohlforth note that half of China’s exports are parts imported to China, assembled there and then exported — mostly for Western multinationals. The authors also suggest that payments for intellectual property are a key measure of technological strength. In 2013, China took in less than $1 billion, while the United States received $128 billion. In 2012, America registered seven times as many “triadic” patents — those granted in the United States, Europe and Japan.

From the WashPo: A quiz given to students at Burns Middle School in Mobile, Alabama contains a lot of questions deemed by the teacher to be relevant to modern culture. A couple included:  "Tyrone knocked up four girls in the gang... There are 20 girls in the gang. What is the exact percentage of girls that Tyrone knocked up?" and “Dwayne pimps 3 ho’s. If the price is $85 per trick, how many tricks per day must each ho turn to support Dwayne’s $800 per day crack habit?” It is always important to make lessons applicable to the lowest common denominator, isn't it?

Still today, as always, trade and betterment are threatened by the scorn of priest, knight, gentleman, poet, or thug, from Green to neo-Nazi.--McCloskey

Foods are composed of three basic elements: fat, carbohydrate, and protein. Gluten is a protein contained in wheat, rye and barley—ingredients which are common, especially in processed foods. In roughly 1% of adults and children, genetics plus gluten combine in ways that we do not completely understand to trigger a condition called celiac disease, which can damage the intestinal lining and lead to serious nutritional and gastrointestinal problems among other issues. For people with celiac disease, gluten is toxic and should be completely avoided in the diet. However, in almost all children, gluten travels through the intestine without causing disease and will never lead to problems. To date, science has not shown that there is a toxin in gluten that makes it bad for our bodies.

AAAAaaaannnnnddd.....a graph:
Chart of the Day

Friday, August 12, 2016

Five Books

A question that comes up periodically: What five books do you recommend to introduce someone to reading?
A dangerous question. Perhaps a hidden Rorschach Test. Fiction or non-fiction? Should I include the New Testament? Limit it to classics? What does it mean if I don't? What about the Russians?  What about fantasy? So many traps. The answer is as revealing as a poem.
Quora has wonderful answers enhanced by its multicultural reach. But I would refine the question this way: What five books would you recommend to someone to encourage them to read more? That means the book must be approachable, enjoyable and revealing about the written word.
So, my answers are:
1. Death Comes for the Archbishop by Willa Cather
2. Blood Meridian by Cormac McCarthy
3. Daughter of Time by Josephine Tey
4. The Count of Monte Cristo by Dumas
5. A Tale of Two Cities by Charles Dickens
And, if Blood Meridian drives you crazy or you don't think Daughter of Time is substantive enough, substitute The Dubliners by James Joyce

Thursday, August 11, 2016

Ignoring the Plight of the Venezualans for a Greater Good

One way to solve problems is to outlaw them. So President Maduro of Venezuela has decreed that any company that goes out of business has committed economic treason and its employees are subject to arrest.
Inflation went from 19 percent in 2012 to, the IMF estimates, 720 percent this year, and a projected 2,200 percent the next. So the army has started forcing butchers to sell food at a 90 percent loss, and the government has said it can force anyone to leave their job and work for at least two months growing food instead. Amnesty International has said this is tantamount to "forced labor," which is just a polite way of describing what's very close to modern-day slavery.
An article on Venezuela in the WashPo ends this way. "It brings to mind the old joke: Under capitalism, man exploits man, and under Bolivarian socialism, it's just the opposite."
Really? I suppose there is some absurd humor there but it is more absurd. Capitalism is the free exchange of labor and goods for labor and goods. Nothing going on in the typically failing Socialist state is free. And exchange is never involved--unless you include bartering for your life.
There's a better joke: If the socialist government will just outlaw gravity, there will be fewer skinned knees and cheaper air travel.

Wednesday, August 10, 2016

Cab Thoughts 8/10/16

Let us admit to ourselves, once and for all, that the notion of history as an exact science is just for convenience – “for simple folk”, as the museum guard used to say, showing two skulls – in youth and old age – of one and the same criminal.--Vladimir Nabokov, from "On Generalities," which opens "There is a very seductive and very dangerous demon: the demon of generalities."

Fonts have become mysterious.

Arguing that the Whitewater investigation somehow initiated the bad blood in Washington one would have to overlook the Henry Hyde attack. Chairman of the powerful House Judiciary Committee, Henry Hyde had  been the victim of an attack by the liberal Internet publication Salon on September 15, 1998.  That magazine had revealed that Hyde had engaged in an adulterous affair with a hairdresser named Cherie Snodgrass in 1965, back when Hyde was forty- one years old. Thirty- three years later, with his wife Jeanne dead of breast cancer and his four grown children raising children of their own, Hyde had been forced to confess his "youthful indiscretions," the most humiliating experience of his four decades in public life. 
Jonathan Broder, Washington bureau chief of Salon, was forced to resign after criticizing the online magazine's decision to disclose Rep. Henry Hyde's old affair. "Deservedly or not," Broder wrote, "Salon already has a pro-Clinton reputation. With the story you are now planning to run, which I do not believe meets the journalistic threshold, Salon will be indelibly stained as a vicious Clinton attack dog. . . . There is no way in the world that you and Salon will escape broad censure as hypocritical thugs. . . . We will become the left-wing equivalent of the American Spectator." Salon's editorial stated their reason for publishing it was "ugly times call for ugly tactics."

Two themes seem to dominate commencement speeches. One is shameless self-advertising by people in government, or in related organizations supported by taxpayers or donors, saying how nobler it is to be in “public service” than working in business or other “selfish” activities.
In other words, the message is that it is morally superior to be in organizations consuming output produced by others than to be in organizations that produce that output. Moreover, being morally one-up is where it’s at.
The second theme of many commencement speakers, besides flattering themselves that they are in morally superior careers, is to flatter the graduates that they are now equipped to go out into the world as “leaders” who can prescribe how other people should live.
In other words, young people, who in most cases have never had the sobering responsibility and experience of being self-supporting adults, are to tell other people — who have had that responsibility and that experience for years — how they should live their lives.--Sowell
 
Who is...Deirdre N. McCloskey?
 
Sen. Elizabeth Warren, sometimes called “Pocahontas,” claims that she is of Cherokee Indian ancestry. That helped her land a job at diversity-hungry Harvard University as a professor of law. She described herself as a minority in the Harvard Law School directory. Not only was her great-grandfather not a Cherokee as she claimed, but he was a white man who boasted of shooting a Cherokee Indian.
But there is a connection, right?
 
In 1850 Lionel Rothschild 'loaned' Queen Victoria and her consort sufficient funds to purchase the lease on Balmoral Castle and its 10,000 acres. When he was secretary of state for India, Randolph Churchill (Winston's father) approved the annexation of Burma on 1 January 1886, thus allowing the Rothschilds to issue their immensely successful shareholding in the Burma ruby mines. Churchill demanded that the viceroy, Lord Dufferin, annex Burma as a New Year's present for Queen Victoria, but the financial gains rolled into the House of Rothschild. Esher noted sarcastically that Churchill and Rothschild seemed to conduct the business of the Empire together, and Churchill's 'excessive intimacy' with the Rothschilds caused bitter comment, but no one took them to task.
 
Golden oldie:
 
In March, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services temporarily suspended the development of a proposed “Non-Recommended Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA)–Based Screening” measure that would discourage PSA screening in all men. The U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) is currently in the process of updating its recommendations for prostate-cancer screening. Much of the controversy surrounding screening revolves around the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal, and Ovarian (PLCO) Cancer Screening Trial, which randomly assigned men to annual prostate-cancer screening or usual care and showed equivalency in the primary outcome of prostate-cancer mortality. The major criticism of this trial relates to the degree of PSA testing in the control group as reported in the 2009 publication of the trial results. Subsequent analyses, including the 2012 USPSTF recommendations, have interpreted the rate cited in the 2009 report as “approximately 50% of men in the control group received at least 1 PSA test during the study.”
This is an inaccurate interpretation of PSA testing in the control group during the trial. But the information was obtain by questionnaire and recall, so who is surprised? Nonetheless, the powers-that-be want to stop the testing so we'll have to wait and see their twisted logic.
 
We have to take ideas seriously. It would be very strange to give a history of The United States that did not take seriously "All men are created equal," or The Gettysburg Address, or "I have a dream."--McCloskey

Playwright J.M. Barrie conceived of a character named Peter Pan who escapes from the nursery and attempts to live as a bird. Having cut himself off from human society -- 'a Betwixt-and-Between' -- he becomes an outlaw. When he tries to return to his bedroom, the windows are barred: 'There is no second chance, not for most of us.' The idea was further developed in the 1902 novel The Little White Bird, where Peter Pan appears as a major subplot. After its success, Barrie set about expanding the character into a full 'fairy play': a hasty first draft was finished by April 1904, and Peter Pan was born.
 
In 1919, Fumimaro Konoe, future Prime Minister of Japan attended the Paris Peace Conference. Though Woodrow Wilson espoused seemingly high-minded principals such as his notion of national self-determination, the Japanese and other Asians felt a deep sense of exclusion during the conference, especially when a Japanese attempt to include clauses regarding racial equality and religious freedom in the work of the conference was rejected. Afterwards, Konoe denounced the inequity of an Anglo-American dominated world in letters he thought were private but they were translated and spread, earning him the reputation of a radical. He wrote later in a booklet, that "the white people -- and the Anglo-Saxon race in particular­ -- generally abhor colored people is an apparent fact, so blatantly observ­able in the U.S. treatment of its black people. I for one felt a sort of racial oppression more in London than in Paris, and that sense was heightened even further upon my arrival in New York."
 
The idea behind the Indianapolis Motor Speedway started in the early 1900s as a proving ground for the budding American auto industry. Detroit and Indianapolis were battling for the right to be called 'the Motor City' and Indy was the early leader, building more cars than its Michigan rival. However, Detroit had the advantage of being located on the Great Lakes, with a port to ship in raw materials and ship out vehicles, and Henry Ford was hard at work there, developing the assembly line. So a group of India­napolis industry leaders figured a large testing facility was needed to help tip the balance in favor of their city.
 

Turpitude: n: 1. vile, shameful, or base character; depravity. 2. a vile or depraved act. usage: He would, perhaps, argue that, though abstract Right is absolute and unchangeable, the alternative Wrong, though never shading down into Right, varies immeasurably in degree of turpitude ...-- Joseph Furphy, Such Is Life, 1903
ety: Turpitude finds its roots in the Latin term turpis meaning "base, vile." It entered English in the late 1400s.

The Quiet Don was published in four parts in Russia between 1928 and 1940.  It is one of the greatest of twentieth-century Russian novels, and when Mikhail Sholokhov was awarded the Nobel Prize for Literature in 1965, the Swedish Academy cited its “artistic force and integrity”. But ever since the end of the 1920s there have been rumors that Sholokhov was not the only, or even the main, author. These suspicions have recently received fresh support in the form of an unfinished manuscript by a Russian critic, no longer living, which was published last month in Paris by the YMCA Press under the title Stremya “Tikhovo Dona” (The Current of “The Quiet Don”), with an introductory essay by Alexander Solzhenitsyn.  A twenty-three-year-old beginner had created a work out of material which went far beyond his own experience of life and his level of education.  Neither the level of achievement nor the rate of production has been confirmed or repeated in the subsequent forty-five years of his career. Too many miracles !—writes  Solzhenitsyn. But five “proletarian” writers (Serafimovich, Averbach, Kirshon, Fadeyev, Staysky) declared that those who were spreading doubt and suspicion were “enemies of the proletarian dictatorship” and threatened to “bring them to cowl.”
Very similar to the old Shakespeare debate. 

I have been interested in a woman named Deirdre N. McCloskey who has been appearing with more frequency because of a trilogy of books she has written on the emergence of the economically successful West. She is a remarkable polymath. A review of her website shows these generalities: Deirdre N. McCloskey has been since 2000 UIC Distinguished Professor of Economics, History, English, and Communication at the University of Illinois at Chicago. Trained at Harvard as an economist, she has written fifteen books and edited seven more, and has published some three hundred and sixty articles on economic theory, economic history, philosophy, rhetoric, feminism, ethics, and law. She taught for twelve years in Economics at the University of Chicago, and describes herself now as a "postmodern free-market quantitative Episcopalian feminist Aristotelian."  And this surprising personal summary: “I’m a literary, quantitative, postmodern, free-market, progressive-Episcopalian, Midwestern woman from Boston who was once a man. Not ‘conservative’! I’m a Christian libertarian.”
 
From a book review of Illiberal Reformers: As Leonard’s title suggests, as a rule early progressives were far from liberal in the broad sense of the word. Instead, combining a belief in eugenics and trendy pseudo-science, a distrust of markets, a disavowal of the American natural rights tradition and a broad faith in the power of government to shape society for good, they sought public policies that would benefit “fit” white male breadwinners of northern European origin and their families at the expense of “unfit” African Americans, Eastern and Southern Europeans, women and Northern European men with physical or mental disabilities. Thus, for example, rather than disputing the notion that minimum wage laws would lead to the exclusion of the latter groups from the labor market, progressive reformers thought that this was a strong point in favor of such laws. Moreover, “in the early twentieth century, progressives displayed an open contempt for individual rights.”

The State Department’s independent watchdog has concluded that Hillary Clinton’s use of a private email server and months of missing records from her tenure were violations of State Department policies.  Hillary never sought approval for her private email setup from senior information officers --who would have refused the request because of security risks, an inspector general report says. The IG also found no evidence that lawyers had reviewed Clinton's document-retention procedures to make sure the law was followed. Clinton, along with her top deputies Cheryl Mills, Jake Sullivan, and Huma Abedin, all refused to meet with investigators, the report's authors complained. I watched interviews and these people are absolute expert deceivers. Expert. The thing to remember in all the discussion is that the Federal Records Statute is not a custom or protocol, it is the law. It is true the State Department regulations are not a law--which these masters of deception emphasize--but the regulations are written to conform to existing law.

“When has the Fed ever gotten it right about the economy? Did it see the crash coming in 2000? Did it see the housing bubble? Did it see the Wall-Street meltdown in 2008, or the bubble it’s creating now. The answer is no…it has no clear view of the future.”--David Stockman

The Clinton flap is remarkable. The thing to remember in all the discussion is that the Federal Records Statute is not a custom or protocol, it is the law. It is true the State Department regulations are not a law--which these masters of deception emphasize--but the regulations are written to conform to existing law. So, if a=b and b=c, then..... Their casual, pointed insincerity is awe-inspiring.
 
The Fukushima clean-up team remains in the dark about the exact locations of 600 tons of melted radioactive fuel from three devastated nuclear reactors, the chief of decommissioning told the ABC’s Foreign Correspondent program in an exclusive interview. Following the tsunami-caused 2011 meltdown at Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant uranium fuel of three power generating reactors gained critical temperature and burnt through the respective reactor pressure vessels, concentrating somewhere on the lower levels of the station currently filled with water.
The melted nuclear fuel from Reactor 1 poured out completely, estimated 30 to 50 percent of fuel from Reactor 2 and 3 remained in the active zone, Masuda said.
The official estimates that  approximately “200 tons of [nuclear fuel] debris lies within each unit," which makes in total about 600 tons of melted fuel mixed up with metal construction elements, concrete and whatever else was down there.

AAaaaannnnnndddd.....a news article:

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

"Peribañez" at the Quantum Theater: A Review

It was a lovely night at the Quantum Theater, the outdoor theater in Mellon Park. The weather warm, the night sky clear. The cast from the just performed play, "Peribañez" by Lope de Vega, walked onto the stage to take their bow. They were tight jawed to a man. Not the hint of a smile on the face of any of the actors.
Quantum is a theater group started in 1990 who stage plays "environmentally in places that aren’t theatres." This year, in addition to "Peribañez," they will do "The River," "The Man who Mistook His Wife for a Hat," and "Collaborators." The actors are young; significant effort has gone into settings and costumes, much from CMU.
Lope de Vega is a major playwright, a contemporary of Cervantes and Shakespeare, who influenced theater profoundly. He was a lyrical writer and his talent was enhanced by volume; it is said he wrote hundreds of plays. His life was filled with violence and contradiction but his themes are broad but consistent, often involving love and honor. He had profound respect for rural life, the Church, and  the Crown.
In "Peribañez," a charming couple marries and, through a series of accidents, the wife becomes the target of an obsessed, love-struck nobleman. The opening scene of the wedding party returning from the wedding is wonderful, sincere and funny. Even the priest laughs at himself. As the story develops, the obsessed nobleman and his enablers develop an increasing but inept threat to the couple. The war against "the Infidels" provides an opportunity for the nobleman to draft the farmer into the conflict and expose his wife in his absence. And the play accelerates to its end.
The play itself has some remarkable qualities. The classic English plotting is absent; characters surprise the audience with understandable decisions but decisions that are not foreshadowed. And so it is with the action: A play that in its heart seems to be a comedy veers quickly into dangerous territory. Cousins turn on each other. The goofy nobleman becomes malevolent. None of this is unreasonable, only surprising, as the English generation of Spanish Tragedy becomes fulfilled.  
This was a completely enjoyable night, a well acted play under a lovely sky. The actors were good, the nobleman and the treasonous cousin excellent. The choice of the male lead was curious for, as a black man in old Spain, he likely would have been the enemy in the war against the "Infidel," but he was a credible and sympathetic lead, aside from an annoying mannerism he had rubbing his nose.
This kind of evening is hard to come by and should be supported by the community. I wish only that the actors seemed to enjoy it as much as I did.